Views Of Matter Essay -- essays research papers fc

What exactly is national, it is non an ein truth day interrogate that one asks ones have got self. When looked at thither are many different views on this subject, moreover because of the numerous numbers of different views, it is only possible to look at trio of the discourses. The three discourses of matter to be looked at are the Religious, Scientific, and Philosophical. each discourse has evolved by dint of time into the views that we know, and accept today. The indication between these views on matter differs greatly, however it is possible to say that both three views came from the identical place. This place being ancient Greece it was their belief in gods that brought about trust, philosophy, and then(prenominal) science.The scientific view of matter has evolved over time. Science for many centuries has been attended by philosophical thought, throughout time the mixture of the two is rattling evident. The beginnings of western science, namely physics, coincide w ith that of the first period of Grecian philosophers. natural philosophy is in fact a term derived from the Greek word physis which performer the endeavor of seeing the essential nature of all things (Capra, 1977, p. 9). The basic ideas evolved from the Greek philosophers, and philosophy remained a big bring out of science right up until the Newtonian view of the universe.Newton had a mechanistic view of the universe. He saw the universe as a three dimensional position. This quadriceps femoris was unchangeable and eer stagnant. In Newtons own words, inviolate space, in its own nature, without regard to anything external, remains always similar and immovable. totally changes in the physical world were described in terms of a separate dimension, called time, which again was absolute, having no connection to the material world and catamenia smoothly, from the past through the present to the future. (Capra, 1977, p. 43). The things, which do up the absolute space and time, we re material particles. These were perceived by Newton to be a part of all matter, as well as indestructible. Newtons views were very parallel to those of the early Greek atomists. Both were based on the distinction between the full and the void, between matter and space, and in both models the particles remained always identical in their mass and shape. (Capra, 1977, p. 43). The difference between these two views came in the forces that acted upon the particles. The early Greeks... ...nce.Thus the different views on matter are 1. trust God created All matter. 2. Science All matter is made up of tiny particles, (molecules/atoms) which have forces that act upon them to create movement. 3. Philosophy Questions the existence of matter (what is real?) and shows why it exists if indeed it does. Religion is mystical and is supernatural, and believes that God has created all matter. Science got its beginnings from early philosophers, but when philosophers moved away from the question of w hat is something made of, to the question of does it exist? Science still tried to prove our existence, through what matter is made of. Religion and philosophy differ in that religion has an answer to the question of the existence of matter. This is the same for science it has proved that there are tiny particles called atoms that make up every thing. So of the three discourses, philosophy is the only one still searching for an answer to the question of the existence of matter. BibliographyCapra, Fritjof. The Tao of physics. Bantam Books, Toronto, 1977.Russell, B. The problem of philosophy. A Galaxy Book, New York, 1959.Durkhiem, E. basal focus of the religious life.